Monopolistic Competition

Perloff 13.
As discussed in oligopoly, it is reasonable to think that firms with differentiated products do not act as price-takers. “Monopolistic Competition” is how some researchers (mostly in international trade and macroeconomics) think about this problem.

This topic is here for completeness and is not a core part of the course. If you want to understand it better, I recommend the chapter by Krugman and Wells linked below (Krugman is a top international trade guy).

What is it?

Model Price-taking Free entry
Perfect Competition Yes Yes
Monopoly No No
Monopolistic Competition No Yes

Mathematically, we have
  • MC(q) = MR(q) because the firms are not price-takers, and
  • P = AC(q) because free entry implies zero profit.

There are two major differences between this and the hedonic-Demand-with-Bertrand-pricing model of oligopoly:1

  • Assumptions on preferences. Goods are differentiated, but the modeler does not care how — whether two goods are complements or substitutes and their cross-price elasticity. Instead, all goods are viewed as imperfect substitutes, with the relationship summarized by an "elasticity of substitution."
  • Scope for strategic behavior. Free entry means that there are no (or weaker) concerns about collusion, predatory pricing, etc.

More resources

Comments

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License